The new wowserism is a very recent development that has resulted from media hysteria and the confusion between two entirely different things.

The models of Bill Henson were not abused, harmed or mistreated in any way, and likewise neither were those of Piloxi Papapetrou, Lisa Thomasetti, Sally Mann or so many other artists targetted by this campaign of ignorance.

The models and artists have every right to sue these fools for such blatant false accusation and innuendo.

Mc CAIN remains CAIN.

Hey USA, hey USA.
McCain remains a Cain.
Hey USA,
what’s your game,
can anybody play
the games of Cain.?

Hey USA, hey USA.
Oh, what a shame,
if your President becomes Cain.

Oh USA, there burns a shameful flame
in the brain of Cain.
And tell me who is Abel
in your bad games.?

Don’t you see the sign of Cain
in McCain’s brain.?
Can’t you see on the forehead of God’s enemy
the sign of Cain.?

Hey USA,
what’s your game,
can anybody play
with atombombs.?

Is it a sign of Abel or of Cain
your bad mad game
USA
you lost long time ago the holy flame
U-nited S-atanic A-ssociation,
USA.

Oh, what a shame
the american way.

USA, don’t you know,
the american way of life
is not the way of truth and light.

Greedyness is the line of Cain and his sign.

THE ONE WHO HATES THE TRUTH IS CURSED USA.
USA THAT’S THE WRONG WAY
DAY BY DAY.
*
!!!. - WITHOUT TRUTH YOU ARE THE LOSER - FOREVER - .!!!
!!!. - THE HOLY DIVINE JUSTICE-MACHINE IS ROLLING. -
THE ONE WHO HATES THE TRUTH IS CURSED
AND WILL BE ELIMINATED - .!!!
© Gustav Staedtler./. veritasindeum
!!!.—- VERITAS — VENI — VIDI — VICI —–.!!!

Read more.:
USA das ist McCAIN
http://wahrheitweltweit.wordpress.com/2008/09/15/usa-das-ist-mccain-2/
*
http://truthtotruth.wordpress.com/

Corrie Perkin’s report in The Australian about the Henson photograph up for auction at Lawson-Menzies gives the title as ‘Untitled 1985/86′, so the photograph must be from the same series.

The image in Mnemosyne is catalogued as follows:

Untitled 1985/86
from a series of 154 type C photographs
106.5 x 86.5

Perkins describes a sleeping “teenager”, but provides no other identifying details

If the catalogue numbers/titles and dates are accurate and concordant, there is no other sleeping child on a bed in that series (in chiaroscuro the model looks older than when the image is ‘exposed’). There is only one other teenage female nude in that series (oiled and standing), but that is the sum of it - the remainder comprises his usual trojan horse mixed bag (mainly ‘romantic’ soft focus heads of girls and boys in this show).

If this is the same image (on of an edition of several usually), then it is unequivocally child pornography (albeit from Henson’s early career) that Lawson-Menzies are trying to flog on behalf of their client.

Tamara Winikoff (NAVA) is whacking it with a big club but this putrifying old corpse just keeps floating to the surface!

In spite of her fanciful pronouncements, one wonders how the Classification Board would get around this particular image…..

ckick this>>>>>> http://www.procint.com/henks

Ultimately vulnerable in sleep, the child’s disney tee-shirt is pulled up revealing her pubic area. Her hand is between her legs.

The tv set beside her bed is emitting blue static. It is the paedophilic eye in the room, a decoy from Henson’s own.

This image conforms my suspicions that Henson’s entire oeuvre is a trojan horse for his paedophilic activities. His pattern over the years seems to be to pull back from the edge as soon as things get a little too explicit. Talk about ‘edgy’! Talk about ‘boundary-riding’, talk about ‘transgression’! He ruptures continuity by interpolating neo-baroque landscape and non-figurative spells, or clothed children. If you check ‘Mnemosyne’ out, you will find the child pornography, and you will find, if you cross check images with the exhibition index, that the most explicit or unequivocally child pornographic images were excluded from the 2005 retrospective. No doubt the state gallery had to play it a little safe.

Henson is very cunning. He is well versed in renaissance and baroque symbology. He leaves little clues. If you go to the Roslyn Oxley website (http://www.roslynoxley9.com.au/artists/18/Bill_Henson/98/33508/) there is is a studio shot of a girl, naked from the waist down, that includes a fallen bicycle. That is the paedophilic subtext that announces to the club that the girl is a child - as is the disney tee shirt worn by the child on p 258 (above) . The most dreadful thing about the tee shirt is that it depicts a cartoon image of sylvester the cat having captured tweetie bird - a real “aha!” moment in a classic narrative of the predator and the preyed upon if ever there was one.

Perhaps Henson is telling his own story. Many abuse survivors engage in re-enactments. Whether this is the case or not, he is now the perpetrator.